Industrial Plant (Continuous Process)
Key Result
Transparent selection based on verifiable metrics with a turnkey investment range of US$ 2.56 – 2.99 million.
Timeline
2.5 months (tender + evaluation + negotiation)
Investment
US$ 2.56 – 2.99 million
The Challenge
The plant sought to install a photovoltaic system on rooftops and available land, but needed an independent and objective process to: invite qualified providers, compare their technical-financial offers, and choose the proposal with the best cost-benefit ratio under different regulatory tariff and financing scenarios.
Service
Continuous process industrial plant — Photovoltaic Provider Evaluation and Selection
Our Approach
Structured tender (1 month)
A "turnkey" tender was issued to six previously validated bidders, and technical visits were coordinated to ensure equal conditions.
Financial evaluation (3 weeks)
Self-consumption and self-consumption + surplus sale models. Sensitivities: energy price; financing options (bank loans and leasing); tax incentives.
Executive report (1 week)
Comprehensive comparison of indicators (IRR, NPV, LCOE, payback) and final recommendation.
Timeline
2.5 months (tender + evaluation + negotiation)
Investment
US$ 2.56 – 2.99 million
The Results
Results Dashboard
Transparent selection based on verifiable metrics with a turnkey investment range of US$ 2.56 – 2.99 million.
Investment values at the time of project evaluation.
What Did TeraVolta Contribute?
100% transparent and documented process.
Standardized evaluation matrix with 17 minimum quotation items.
Decision based on verifiable metrics, without the need to estimate unquantifiable future savings.
Need to select the best provider for your renewable project?
Talk to our team and discover how we structure objective evaluation processes.